Skip to main content

BREEAM (Jargon Buster) G#1397 N#1370

By 4 February 2014January 9th, 2019Code, Encyclopaedia, Entries, Jargon Buster

GBE > Encyclopaedia Code > Jargon Buster > Entries > B > G#11397 N#1370

BREEAM Jargon Buster

BREEAM Jargon Buster
About: 


Definitions:


Opinion:

GBE and many in the UK are critical of BREEAM, Eco Homes (EH) and Code for Sustainable Homes (CfSH) and their reliance upon Green Guide to Specification (GGtS) for many reasons
  • First its not Green,
  • Second its not a Guide to Specification
  • Its not a level playing field it covers conventional construction and misses out all the green construction method options
  • If the construction you choose for your project is missing you cannot get credits in BREEAM EH CfSH
  • GBE never find the one we are using listed
  • It decides which construction methods are applicable to any building type/use.
  • But Architects don’t follow those rules.
  • We wanted to use timber in a school, it was not listed so no credits, but if we chose concrete we would get a few credits
  • Its not a level playing field it covers conventional materials and misses out on the green material options
  • It create a technical barrier to eco materials entry into the market contrary to EU Procurement rules.
  • Its full of incompetent elemental assemblies e.g. uninsulated wall, incompetent insulation in timber frame,
  • It ignores all the accessories which are made of metal and plastic and constitute a high % of LCA but ignored
  • Its full of irresponsible sourcing decisions, Chinese stone, Spanish slate,
  • In my experience it never has the materials you want
  • You cannot get credits for them in BREEAM EH CfSH
  • Its development is dependent upon industry sector support
  • It approached big industry sector associations and ignored the small manufacturers and their products
  • A-G is simplistic for simple specifiers but its still based on LCA so its not cheap
  • But is most things are A its unhelpful
  • If pvc window scrap is turned into plastic road cones and garden gnomes it makes pvc window A+ rated or C rated if manufacturers product is assessed.
  • Specifiers have to use it, they do not choose to use it.
  • Design& Build Contractors use it to justify cheap PVC A+ rated windows, all other performance requirements are ignored.
ASBP Alliance for Sustainable Building Products) set up in reaction to GGtG to challenge it to Government.
GBE are members of ASBP.
ASBPs critique of GGtS presented to DCLG (Government) by Good Homes Alliance (GHA)
BRE Wales are critical of BRE England’s GGtS
BrianSpecMan also wrote a 80 page critique and lots of Powerpoints about what is wrong with it.

© GBE NGS ASWS BrianMurphy
aka BrianSpecMan
4th February 2014 – 9th January 2019

BREEAM Jargon Buster
Images: 


bream logo small. png


© GBE NGS ASWS BrianMurphy
aka BrianSpecMan
4th February 2014 – 9th January 2019

BREEAM Jargon Buster
See Also: 


GBE JARGON BUSTER


GBE CPD


GBE PROJECTS

  • Pembrokeshire St David’s Visitors Centre
    • BREEAM Excellent
  • Aberystwyth Arts Centre Dance Studio
    • GGtS says you don’t build this type of building with timber
    • would not give credits
    • encouraged the use of concrete instead
    • Bullshit, BREEAM Dropped

GBE REPORTS

ASBP & PE INTERNATIONAL


© GBE NGS ASWS BrianMurphy
aka BrianSpecMan
4th February 2014 – 9th January 2019

Leave a Reply